Perception of people towards RUU355: a study on IIUM students
Keywords:
Perception, RUU355, Malaysian Legal System, cognitive, affective, evaluativeAbstract
The objective of the study is to know the perceptions of people towards recent introduction of Act 355 Shariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965, (RUU355). This study also seeks to construct factors influencing people’s perceptions towards RUU355. Besides, the present study aims also to discover whether there are relationship between political affiliations, religious background, and legal understanding with their perceptions towards RUU355. The survey was conducted by distributing questionnaire among 309 IIUM students. The data analyzed by descriptive statistics, factor analysis, and cross-tabulation analysis using SPSS software. The results suggested that there are three factors that influence people’s perceptions, namely, state religion factor, political environment, and knowledge. It is also worth to note that religious background becomes an important characteristic that shapes the perception towards RUU355. Besides, people who have inclination towards PAS have more tendency to agree with RUU355 implementation. It is also suggested that people with more knowledge about RUU355 will have more tendecy to support RUU355.
References
Luqman Thaib. (2013). Muslim politics in Malaysia and the democratization process. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 3, 45-57.
Ashgar Ali Ali Mohamed. (2012). Implementation of Hudud (or limits ordained by Allah for serious crimes) in Malaysia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(23), 237.
Mohd Arip Kasmo, Abur Hamdi Usman, Aminuddin Bashir, Fatin Hazwani Siran, Jamsari Alias, & Azizi Umar. (2015). The attitude of Malaysia toward the Islamic Law: A comparative studyacross the society. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 110.
Jonathan Chia. (2016, November 28). Borneo Post Online. Retrieved from http://www.theborneopost.com/2016/11/28/masing-act-355-amendment-violates-federal-constitution/
Sisters in Islam. (2016, November 26). Retrieved from http://www.sistersinislam.org.my/news.php?item.1455.27
Mohd Asri Zainal Abidin. (2017, February 21). Retrieved from DrMaza.com: https://www.facebook.com/DrMAZA/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED
Mohd Salleh Abu, & Zaidatun Tasir. (2001). Introduction to computer data analysis SPSS 10.0 for windows (Pengenalan kepada analisis data Berkomputer SPSS 10.0 for windows). Kuala Lumpur: Venton Publishing.
Kroz, M., G., L. H., Zerm, R., Reif, M, Girke, M, Matthes, H, Heckman, C. (2008). Validation of a questionnaire measuring the regulation of autonomic function. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 8(26), 1-13.
Hogarty, K., Hines C, Kromrey, J., Ferron, J., & Mumford, K. (2005). The quantity of factor solutions in exploratory factor analysis: The influence of sample size, communality and overdetermination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(2), 202-26.
Jervis, R. (2002). Signaling and perception: Drawing inferences and projecting images. In K. R. Monroe, Political Psychology (pp. 293-312). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pavone, T. (2014). Political culture and democratic homeostasis: A critical review of Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba’s. The Civic Culture.
Coakes, S. J., & Ong, C. (2011). SPSS version 18.0 for windows: Analysis without anguish (1st Edition ed.). John Wiley & Sons Australia Ltd: Milton, QLD, Australia.
Catell, R.B. (1996). The screen test for number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245-276.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Published
PDF Downloads: 352